Liberty & Justice for All?

If we believe in “social justice,”

we should answer two questions first.

Find out why by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Wikipedia

FULL TEXT

“Social justice” is a phrase that individuals and institutions throw around without definition. But students in my classes can’t get away with such a lazy approach. If a student writes a paper using the phrase “social justice” I will always, somewhere in my comments ask two questions,

“What is your ‘social’?” and “What is your standard for ‘justice’?”

Here is an example. A student wrote a declarative comment in his paper saying,

“If there is no justice, there will be no peace.”

He meant that if there was no justice for his social group, his group would not allow anyone to live in peace. It’s a nice sentiment and certainly sincere. But do you see the problem? He did not define any of his terms. So, I asked him,

“If your social group can demand ‘justice’ can the group that opposes your group demand justice too?”

He wasn’t sure how to answer so I continued,

“Upon what basis will you demand justice? Where does that justice come from? What standard gives you the authority to say something is unjust?”

It was obvious the student had not considered the questions. So, I began at the end of his concern saying,

“You think everyone wants ‘peace’ from what you said, is that right?”

He shook his head up and down. “Good!” I continued, “So do I!” He smiled. “So,” I said, “Let’s see if we can find how we get to ‘peace’ by exploring the answer to those questions,

“What is your ‘social’?” and “What is your standard for ‘justice’?”

I went back to the teaching we had done in class on the need for ethical standards to come from somewhere outside ourselves. When the paper was revised, the young man had done diligent work to express why his social group was important and that justice must be based on a standard of right, originating from outside ourselves. It is a lesson for us all: be careful to define our terms.

For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally committed to the idea that our desire for justice, springs from the righteous standards, set by God.

HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY!

Backing into Knowledge

Instead of digging a deep hole

it might be easier just to fall in.

What do I mean? Find out by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

Often, I find myself backing-in to big ideas or big idea people. Here’s an example. I loved the Jesse Stone movies when they first came out and began to ask, “I wonder where those stories originated?” That bit of a quest led me to Robert B. Parker, author of over 50 novels. I dug a little deeper and discovered that Parker earned a PhD in literature. Still further I found that Parker’s PhD dissertation was based on pot-boiler crime writers like Raymond Chandler. The Big Sleep, a Chandler creation, became one of the great film-noir movies of all-time, starring Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall. “That’s so cool!” I thought, “A PhD student chased down the authors of pot-boiler crime novels, and then went on to write them himself!”

I could go further down that rabbit hole, but I’ll stop there. Do you see my point? I backed-in to knowledge. I backed-in to someone’s PhD work. I didn’t begin where most academics begin, focused on a problem, then digging a deep hole of research to find an answer. No, Mark, not paying attention, falls in the deep hole and wonders how he got there. But since I’m in the deep hole of unknowing I begin to think, “Oh! That’s interesting!” And I start to explore.

That’s what I mean by “backing-in.” Sure, I’ve earned a bunch of degrees doing research necessary for that field. But honestly, the work I do often begins with the thought, “Oh! That’s cool!” rather than “There is a problem. I’m going to find a solution.”

Maybe you’re like me. You watch some movie and think, “I wonder where that came from?” And you’re off. You pursue your interests. Your interests become your passions. Your passions cause you to enjoy life’s delights. And at the end of the day, you realize you just backed-in to knowledge.

For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found.

Pride Before the Fall

What can Dr. Seuss teach us?

A lot, as it turns out.

Why? How? Discover the answer by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, SnappyGoat, Wikipedia

FULL TEXT

“Would you rather have me give a 45-minute speech on pride, or read Yertle the Turtle in five minutes?” I ask my students after reading the story. It’s no surprise. After I read Yertle the Turtle to my college students, they request Dr. Seuss, not a lecture, every time. I read the story from a large, hard-cover book, holding it high, so all can see the illustrations, just as I would, if I were reading to my grandchildren.

The story of Yertle teaches us that position, power, and pride can usurp freedom, rights, and care for others. Yertle is a turtle king. He is not satisfied with where he is in the pond. He says,

“With this stone for a throne, I look down on my pond / But I cannot look down on the places beyond.”

So, Yertle commands the turtles to create a stack so he can climb on their backs, in his words,

“If I could sit high, how much greater I’d be!”

He is higher, until, a plain turtle named Mack questions the whole enterprise. In case you’ve never read the story I will leave out any spoilers.

But beyond the obvious message, is the way the story is told. Seuss created memorable characters in King Yertle and Mack. The illustrations are pure Seuss – wonky and wonderful. But I believe it is the poetry that best captures attention. Rhyming is signature Seuss. But rhyming can close the loop on understanding, as primary teachers know full well.

There is a reason I have been reading this same story over and over again for years. The teaching is timeless. But most important to me is the universal concept that words have power, and the power of words can dethrone a king’s arrogance. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of The Comenius Institute, personally seeking the power of words, to tell the truth.

 

 

3 Black Public Intellectuals

These three men have deeply influenced

 

 

 

 

 

how I think as an academic.

Find out why by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, SnappyGoat, Pixabay.com, Google Images, SnappyGoat.com, Unsplash.com, Public Domain Images, piqsels.com

FULL TEXT

What does it mean to be a “public intellectual?” People who shape cultural change through their conversations about ideas. I want to introduce our Truth in Two viewers to a few public intellectuals who have, and continue to, shape my life.

(1) Thomas Sowell. Sowell grew up in Harlem and served in the Marine Corps during the Korean War. Sowell is a senior fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institute. Sowell’s ideas have taken root in the soil of the next generation. Sowell has written over thirty books, over forty years of weekly writings. Hundreds of Sowell’s interviews can be found on YouTube. The lifetime impact of Thomas Sowell can be read in the book, Maverick: A Biography of Thomas Sowell.

(2) Robert Woodson. Woodson was born in Philadelphia. Woodson is an Air Force veteran and has a long history in the Civil Rights movement. Woodson has brought together a cadre of black scholars who create transformational ideas. Together, they believe that the country best able to deliver opportunities for success is the United States of America. 1776 Unites has created curriculum to teach both the history of our country and its opportunities for people today.

(3) Glenn Loury. Loury is a descendent of slaves, grew up on Chicago’s south side and is now an eminent economist who teaches at Brown University. Loury’s podcast “The Glenn Show” deals with all manner of cultural ideas. Loury’s self-description, speaks for itself: [Quote] I am an economist who believes in the virtue of free enterprise. I am a patriot who loves his country. I am a man of the West, an inheritor of its great traditions. As an intellectual, I seek to know the truth, and to speak truths I have been given to know. [End quote]

I couldn’t have said it better myself. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking public intellectuals who point to truth wherever it’s found.

Maverick | MarkEckel.com

https://markeckel.com/2022/02/22/1776unites-com/

Welcome to 1776 Unites | A movement FOR America

The Case For Black Patriotism by Glenn C. Loury | Articles | First Things

3 Ways I Work with Ideas

Ideas are the lifeblood of thinking & writing.

But what do we do when we can’t think about everything?

Find out by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, SnappyGoat

FULL TEXT

I once had a supervisor – my department head – who said of me,

“Mark has so many good ideas it is a shame that he will not be able to act on them all.”

Ever since his statement I have reminded myself of its wisdom: I can’t do it all. If you’re like me, not being able to address every concern, every cultural moment, is frustrating. There are so many ideas hitting my radar all at once. Simply stated, I cannot comment on everything. If I care about so many ideas, what do I do? I find others with whom I agree, while I do my work.

The Heterodox Academy, for example, is a group of professors, of which I am a member, that speaks on behalf of viewpoint diversity. Jonathan Haidt, who started Heterodox, writes, and speaks for free inquiry in the university.

Salvo magazine, an online Christian worldview platform, constantly points its readership to creation ordinances, embedded in the created cosmos. I and others write for this platform because we believe in its mission: “debunking cultural myths that have undercut human dignity.”

It is that human dignity which forms the basis for The School of Liberal Arts, in the university setting where I teach. I work and write in the world of liberal arts because I believe in the humanness of the humanities, foundational thinking coming from my Hebraic-Christian views of life. It is in the university where I can help students wrestle with great ideas.

Yes, I have so many ideas, that I cannot speak to all of them. But I have the unique opportunity to interact with young minds who have great ideas. I write and teach in the liberal arts because I believe our Comenius tagline: ideas change people, people change a culture. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth in ideas wherever they are found.

 

Control Yourself

Control yourself, or someone else will!

Why self-control is better than state-control

Watch our Truth in Two to find out why (full text included).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, SnappyGoat

FULL TEXT

I have to admit a serious concern at the beginning of a new year: I have little control when it comes to sugar. There I’ve said it. I love cakes, cookies, and candy. You name it, Butterfingers, Skittles, caramels, vanilla frosting, sugar cookies, or white chocolate. I am addicted. Yes, I know that my obsession could have dire consequences (think diabetes). So, I try to control myself when it comes to consuming sweets, but you know how it is for an addict. One lick of the cake mixer beater or one taste of cookie dough and I can’t stop eating.

My addiction to sugar reminds me of what some folks call “New Year’s Resolutions.” We decide we must exercise more. So, we buy the equipment or sign on to a gym membership. But by the time Valentine’s Day candy comes out, any commitment to exercise stops after we unwrap the chocolates. Our problem, of course, is control. And here is a principle for all of life: control yourself or someone else will have to control you. If I can’t stop eating sugar by myself, the doctor might make me go on a diet to stop eating.

The Christian statesman, Edmund Burke spoke to our problem with control. He said,

“People are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites. Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without.”

Did you get that? Control yourself or someone else will have to control you. You may be upset with government regulations; but perhaps those regulations exist because you can’t regulate yourself. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, President of the Comenius Institute, trying to control himself (and his sugar intake).

 

5 Most Read Posts in 2022

I am constantly learning what people are most interested in. When I write or speak, I do so out of an internal compulsion, a movement of The Spirit. Apart from teaching series, I communicate about what I see around me. It may be God’s embedded wisdom in creation about business ethics or Scriptural principles about a topic (like the use of our time) or a passionate belief (pro-life is sacrosanct to me) or a different take on an accepted cultural viewpoint (there are ‘secular’ theocracies, for instance) or it could be a person, book, or idea of interest (Maverick, a biography of Thomas Sowell).

In 2022 (*see below) these are the top five posts, out of a total of about 50,000 views over 365 days, across multiple platforms (YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, WarpandWoof.org and MarkEckel.com) that garnered the most attention from our readers, listeners and viewers.

1. “Getting Knocked Down” – People want to hear about your failures. They want to know if you are just like them.

2. “Calamity I”You comfort no one when you do these five things.

3. “Fragmented” – How does it feel to live with paranoid schizophrenia? Our son Tyler explains.

4. “10 Questions to Ask Another Point of View” – Do you get mad and yell? Or do you ask questions? Find out how to counter another point of view.

5. “Make No Mistake” – This is nothing new. It is a renewal. The ten beliefs that have not changed, even after the death of our son.

And don’t forget to sign up on the pop up as the site opens to receive (free of charge!) my Friday emails sent to your inbox. I include thoughts, ideas, websites, and links that may encourage and benefit you!

Thanks for your viewership! Mark

*You can read a tribute to our son Tyler Micah who died on June 16th of this years and number of poems I have written under “Musings.” In fact, nine Truth in Two’s from September through early November were dedicated to Tyler. You can find them on YouTube. I left out the most read pieces across multiple platforms that honored Tyler – by far the most read and watched posts and videos of 2022.

Picture credit: SnappyGoat.com

My Literary Autobiography

“Ever Since,” A Literary Autobiography in 7 Vignettes, Mark Eckel

How we get from here to there, from hither to yon, is a story often untold. Outlined here for the first time is a celebration of the events which and people who have brought me this far.

Three

“Something’s wrong with him.” My paternal grandmother pestered my mom constantly with such statements.

Virginia, my mom was a nurse. Her concerns were different than the German-born, lock-step mother-in-law who didn’t like her anyway.

And I was the problem.

Most babies begin to coo, jabber, and babble within their first year. Outside of crying for necessities, my mom tells me I did not utter a word for three years.

Magically upon my third birthday I began to talk. According to my mom, words, phrases, and sentences began to volcanically erupt from my little person.

I have been talking ever since.

Encyclopedias

“The first time I couldn’t find you I was frantic,” she began the recounting. “I ran through the house beside myself that you had been hurt.”

She paused, then smiled.

“But then I found you sitting beside the book case. You were reading an encyclopedia volume. You looked up, wondering why I was so upset.”

Whimsically she added, “From then on, whenever I wondered why you were so quiet, I knew you were reading a book.”

I have been reading ever since.

Rope

Chaffing one’s inner thigh is no laughing matter. Especially when you’re eleven. Especially when people laugh at you. Especially when fifth grade classmates call you Eckel the Elephant.

I was short and fat – or “stocky” if you bought boys clothes in 1968. My growth spurt, with thanks to my uncles on my mom’s side who were 6’4”, did not begin until middle school. But in fifth grade I was the largest zoo animal anyone in my class had seen.

In fifth grade, the physical education gods had proclaimed all boys should be able to climb a rope, floor to ceiling, some 20 feet in the air. I could literally not get off the ground. My chunky hands had trouble holding the rope. My inept jumps to toggle the snake with my feet always, always ended with braided cat-gut braided stands ripping the flesh off my legs.

The gym teacher would have scared the Marine D.I. in Full Metal Jacket. His abusive Gatling gun tirades left little bodies bleeding from verbal wounds. Directions not followed were restated at 120 decibels. If you were slow, he would thunder “Move it! Chop, chop!” a phrase I had heard repeatedly from my own Marine Corps father who had fought in Korea.

Little boys ahead of me in line darted up the flexible line. It danced as they ascended to the rafters. One after another they breezed through the exercise. I knew my fate even before my turn came. Like my father’s yelling at home, I could already feel the hot gym teacher’s breathe on my face. “Why can’t you climb that rope?! Are you a baby?! Why don’t you lose that fat?!”

The boy in front of me jumped the last few feet off the rope after his Tarzan descent. Time crawled. My ears magnified by twenty every sound in the gym. Sweat dotted my forehead. My stomach rolled. Breathing shallowed. My salivary glands stopped working.

What I heard next was a death sentence, “O.K. Your turn.” I wondered if he had forgotten my name. But there was no doubt a nanosecond after three failed attempts to climb Mount Everest. “Eckel! What’s your problem? Are you a momma’s boy? Maybe you need a ladder! Go sit by the wall til class is done!” There is no word for the verbal shredding of that moment.

My classroom teacher came to get the class. She saw her charges active around the gym, all save me. When she located me, she saw pain sitting on the floor. I watched as she sidled up to the gym teacher, whispered a few words, received a few in response, then walked my way. I began to cry.

Tears soon turned to smiles. Right then and there it had been decided. I would be the M.C. for our elementary school gym night. My classmates came dressed in shorts and tee shirts. I wore a suit fitted for “stocky, size 14.” My classmates prepared around their apparatus. I sat with the teachers. My classmates performed their routine for the evening.

But my classmates didn’t do anything until I announced who they were and what they were to do.

I had been given the microphone.

I have been speaking ever since.

Last

I scored 126th out of 126 students.  When I was a junior in high school our class took a test for possible college level English curriculum in our senior year. Having been told the results, I sat sobbing on my bedroom floor. For some reason, grammatical prowess in my mother tongue eluded me.  Syntax seemed like “sin tax” to me.

And grammar was the first of three levels in the senior curriculum. I had to pass out of one level to get to the next two: essay writing then free writing. I had been behind the door when grammar was taught in middle school. Somewhere, somehow I missed lessons on prepositional phrases, split infinitives, and hanging gerunds. I tried and tried to pass through to the next level. No amount of tutelage helped. I languished in the wasteland of grammatical incoherence.

But the thing was, I could write. I knew instinctively what sounded right. I heard the words even if I didn’t understand how they fit together. And Roy Honeywell knew it.

Roy Honeywell had been my junior English teacher. He knew what I could do. “I would like to read a paper from someone in the class whose writing could be an example to others. He shall remain nameless,” Mr. Honeywell intoned as he read my papers during eleventh grade not once, not twice, but three times.

Now Roy Honeywell was the dual-credit, college-prep teacher in my senior year. He agonized with me as he tried to fill my grammatical knowledge gaps. I took and failed test after test. We were a month into the senior year. Everyone else had matriculated to levels two and three. I was the only one who could not pass the grammar section of the program.

The overwhelming feelings of failure touch me even today. Even as I write this piece I can feel what I felt. The emotional slough I wallowed in then is the swamp I see before me every day.

But the feeling of clandestine secrecy from what happened next lies just beyond the swamp. Roy Honeywell knew what I could do. He knew I could write. So one day he came to my desk and told me that I did not have to pass the grammar exam. I could proceed to level two.

“This is just between me and you,” he stated in firm, hushed tones. “You show me that you can write like I know you can and the grammatical understanding will follow. I have faith in you.” And he walked away.

I did not know what would happen next, but he did. After scoring 126 out of 126, it was not long before my writing scores ranked at the top of the class. I knew I was doing well when Mr. Honeywell began to anonymously read my papers before the class again. I will never forget when he cast a quick, smiling glance in my direction before he began to read my writing.

“I have faith in you.” The words still inspire me today. Mr. Honeywell and I kept in contact. Before I left for college he gave me a box of books he knew I would need. I took my fiancée to meet him prior to our wedding. We wrote a few times before he died during my first stint as a high school teacher.

Roy Honeywell gave me a chance.

I have been giving students a chance ever since.

Greek

My undergraduate degree mandated that I learn koine Greek, the ancient language of the common person in which the New Testament had been written. I fell in love with small words that told other words what to do and where to go.  I was introduced to “from,” “in,” “through,” “beside,” “upon,” and a score of other prepositions in college Greek classes.  The importance of directional connectors cannot be overestimated.  To this day I am impressed by the versatility of the Greek language, the multi-colored interaction of words with each other.

And it was not until I learned another language that I began to understand my own. The halogen headlight of grammatical understanding illumined the darkened corners of my syntactical mind. “Once I was blind, but now I see” had a new context. Scales fell from my eyes. The blindfold was lifted. For the first time in my life, I understood my own language, English.

I have been helping students with English grammar ever since.

 

Fowler

“We have to plant a tree.”

These were the first words out of his mouth.

I had just gotten out of the car.

We had not seen each other in some time. I had written ahead to see if I could visit. “Of course!” was the enthusiastic reply.

But first, we had to plant a tree.

Dr. Don Fowler had been one of my professors in graduate school.

Don road a motorcycle . . . in 1980 . . . way before riding bikes was cool . . . and he taught at a conservative, evangelical seminary. At times, you could trace a sly smile across his face as he rode out of the parking lot; a look of pure joy.

Don’s coffee pot was never off. Most of us believed java—not blood—ran through Don’s veins. Whenever I visited Don in his office he would immediately go to an antechamber through a door in the back of his office, returning with a fresh pot of brew to share.

When you entered Don’s office you were immediately reminded of your grandmother’s attic, nostalgia replaced by rows and stacks and reams of books. I was always in awe of that office. In many ways my office today is an exact replica of his.

When he taught, Don would mash his open palm into his face, momentarily rubbing his head while teaching. I have lost count of how many times I have done exactly that, catching myself in the act, then having to recount why I do so to my wide-eyed students.

Don’s consummate understanding of First Testament language, history, culture, and biblical studies in general was my inspiration. He would hand out notes the size of a small city phone book. Inside were paragraphs of thought, outlines to be completed during class, maps, charts, graphs, and an occasional side-splitting comment about some Assyrian general.

I have had many graduate professors but Don, without exception, was and still is my favorite.

Don’s lively, passionate, caring, relevant lectures enthralled me. His excitement about his material stirred me. Don turned what many might suppose to be dry, dusty historical minutia into soul-stirring replays of events and personas. He would often reflect on current political-cultural issues through the lens of his First Testament teaching. Comprehensive understanding of history 3500 years removed, I would sit on the edge of my seat soaking in his content and delivery.

I have often reflected on Don’s impact on my teaching life asking myself why it was so powerful.

My conclusion is, Don wanted to plant a tree.

So we got in the car, went to the nursery, paid for the tree, returned to his house, dug a hole, and planted the tree. All the while we talked as if nothing had changed from the last time we saw each other. We chatted about life, our families, our teaching, our collective memories. Don cooked dinner for his wife and me. Don and Peg even gave up their bed so that I could sleep comfortably during my overnight visit, each of them taking a couch.

Now, whenever we have guests in our home, our bed becomes theirs. I cook for all our visitors. If there is something to be done around town or around the house invitations to participate are always offered. I have yet to dig a hole, planting a tree with a student of mine, but I have visited a construction site, pored over architectural plans, been given tours through office buildings, witnessed student teachers teach, listened to innumerable vocational dreams, and watched with delight as young lives begin their first steps in ministerial roles.

Yes, Don wanted to plant a tree but by doing so he planted his teaching life into mine.

I have been teaching ever since.

Disturbed

My favorite definition of preaching is “Comfort the disturbed, disturb the comfortable.”

Robert Coles’ The Call of Stories disturbed me. He changed how I taught and now how I write.  His first chapter “Stories and Theories” functioned as a primer for why my writing must incorporate narrative.

Anton Chekhov’s short story “Gooseberries” captures my writer’s conviction that the comfortable should be disturbed:

Behind the door of every contented, happy man there ought to be someone standing with a little hammer and continually reminding him with a knock that there are unhappy people, that however happy he may be, life will sooner or later show him its claws, and trouble will come to him—illness, poverty, losses, and then no one will see or hear him, just as now he neither sees nor hears others.  But there is no man with a hammer.  The happy man lives at his ease, faintly fluttered by small daily cares, like an aspen in the wind—and all is well.[1]

Flannery O’Connor understands how to knock on the door:

The novelist doesn’t write to express himself, he doesn’t write simply to render a vision he believes true, rather he renders his vision so that it can be transferred, as nearly whole as possible, to his reader. . . . Your problem is going to be difficult in direct proportion as your beliefs depart from his. . . . I have to make the reader feel, in his bones if nowhere else, that something is going on here that counts.[2]

Stories are how I began to view my responsibility to comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable.

I have been writing stories ever since.

 

[1] Anton Chekhov. 1947, 1966. The Portable Chekhov. (Viking): 381.

[2] Flannery O’Connor. 1957, 1969. Mystery & Manners. (Reprint: Farrar, Straus, Giroux): 162.

Make No Mistake

This is nothing new.

It is a renewal.

The ten beliefs that have not changed, even after the death of our son (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

 

Picture Credit: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

At Tyler’s memorial I read these opening words: “That’s great, Dad.” These are the words Tyler said to me every time I told him of an article being published, a student’s life impacted, a new approach to teaching used, a video series launched, or an accomplishment of any kind achieved. “That’s great, Dad.”

Make no mistake. The awfulness of my son’s death has not hobbled my beliefs. No. It has made my thinking more vital, visceral, and vigorous. Prophets, those who speak God’s Words, are conditioned not with comfort or ease but with pain and hardship. Suffering I have endured in life, now intensified by Tyler’s homegoing, continues to shape my being. Chiseled by circumstances, Divinely ordained, my words will persist on behalf of biblical Truth. And so, in the spirit of Tyler’s encouragement and Jonathan Edwards’ resolutions, I renew these confessions.

  1. Standing under the Authority of Heaven, I will continue to speak God’s Truth to my time and place.
  2. My interpretive lens will be guided by Hebraic-Christian thinking, prompted by The Spirit.
  3. Care for all people, no matter who, without condition, will be driven by the love of Jesus.
  4. Loving people includes speaking the Truth in love without compromise or condition.
  5. Words from pen or keyboard will be considerate of context and culture without compromising Truth.
  6. Cultural communication will be spoken within the wisdom and warnings of Scripture.
  7. Doing good for all people, as much as is possible, will be my daily undertaking.
  8. Practicing benevolence and excellence will be my conduct through all my vocational endeavors.
  9. As I have strength, I will endeavor to offer the gifts given to me to the benefit of The Church and culture.
  10. And I will give myself more and more to Christian discipleship of any who desire to walk this road with me.

“That’s great dad.” My son’s words will always ring in my ears. My Truth in Two series during Fall 2022 is a tribute to our son Tyler Micah. We lament his death while desiring to give voice to all who suffer in any way.

Fragmented

How does it feel

to live with paranoid schizophrenia?

Our son Tyler explains in this Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

 

Picture Credit: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat, Toledo Museum of Art, https://www.toledomuseum.org/about/news/july-1-art-minute-chuck-close-alex

FULL TEXT

Tyler once sent me a picture from the Toledo Museum of Art. The portrait was of “Alex,” from a Chuck Close art exhibit. Tyler told me, “Dad, this is how I feel inside myself. Fragmented.” The picture of a man’s face is created by Chuck Close out of dots, dashes, and abstract shapes. The painting is not of a human face as much as it may be, of a person’s view of themselves.

The fragmentation Tyler felt was represented in his house. If you had the good fortune of visiting Tyler in his home, you would see horizontal spaces everywhere – whether on tables or door frames – filled with broken things. His daily walks with his dogs would cause him to pick up shattered pieces of metal, plastic, or wood. What some creatives call “found art” was Tyler’s pursuit. He cared for broken things.

It has struck me since Tyler’s passing that his jars and spaces filled with broken things may have been statements about how he did not want anything left out, keeping them, perhaps, wishing, they could be put back together. A picture from above one of Tyler’s doors in his home is but one example.

One of the many poems I have written since Tyler’s death this summer honors both his fragmented mind and his care for Broken Things.

Collections / Round his house. / Exhibits from the / Streets of life.

Walking / He gathered / Fragments / Artifacts of life.

Remnants / Metal, plastic, wood / Remembered / Careful of life.

Horizontal / Spaces full / Museums / Bits of life.

Nothing whole / Parts missing / Puzzle pieces / Reflections of life

Picture complete / Now, not then, / Shard collections were / Albums of his life.

I kept a picture of “Alex” by Chuck Close along with other pictures of Tyler. I never want to forget how he saw himself and how different his mind is now resting in peace. My Truth in Two series during Fall 2022 is a tribute to our son Tyler Micah. We lament his death while desiring to give voice to all who suffer in any way.

[This material is drawn from a poem posted on social media. Similar words and ideas can be found by a search at MarkEckel.com where you can also find a tribute to my son. My video series on “suffering” may also be of benefit.]