Why do I have concerns about hierarchies and taxonomies?
Give me a minute to explain (and don’t miss the Afterword).
It is important to think about “thinking.”
There is a new book out on biblical integration that accepts the patterns of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Maslow’s Hierarchy as if they were given from Mt. Sinai. That upsets me. Why? The source of an idea matters. Consider that Bloom’s taxonomy only concerns itself with the intellect, leaving out any attitudinal concerns. Or consider that Maslow’s Hierarchy ends with “self-actualization,” without any reference to supernatural concerns, contrary to a Christian point of view.
As an academic I will read or listen to anyone’s point of view. What concerns me is when people will not give honest attention to the worldview of the person holding the position. The content of belief comes from someone who begins with an assumption that may be different from mine. As a teacher, I should always be cognizant of that idea.
Thanks for spending this minute with me, Dr. Mark Eckel.
Mark Eckel (MA English, ThM Old Testament, PhD Social Science Research) is Executive Director of the Center for Biblical Integration, Liberty University.
“Give Me a Minute” is an ongoing effort to simply, clearly, and quickly explain aspects of true Truth.
Gratitude, as always, to my longtime friend, videographer, and tech guru Josh for his continued service.
AFTERWORD
Every theory comes from a worldview held by a person who subscribes to that view.
Maslow’s view of life excised any transcendent truth, making his hierarchy earthbound and human centered.
Bloom focuses almost exclusively on cognitive and behavioral verbs in his taxonomy (“motive” and “value” may be two exceptions, nonetheless, there is no understanding of the internal nature of the person given by that verbiage). Do consider “Breaking Down the Bad of Bloom’s” by Jason Barney.
I am not arguing that elements of these theories are all wrong. What I am concerned about is an acceptance without Christian critique of these or any theories. Maslow’s focus on “family” is important to me. I utilize the verbs in Bloom for lesson plan development. However . . .
A biblical view would include ideas that are purely intrinsic, a transformation only possible by internal change.
I finished a journal essay, one section given to educational affective objectives (if you’re keeping track, I have written on the topic in these Friday emails obtained by sign up at the pop-up at MarkEckel.com : 4.4.25, 1.31.25, 4.26.24). Here is part of what I wrote:
Doctrine should be internalized, affecting our affections. Students in my Spring 2025 Gothic horror literature class, for instance, would be asked about doctrine through affective questions. Each query is burgeoning with creaturely concerns:
- How has your attitude changed?
- How have you been internally motivated?
- What virtues should you display?
- How has this experience brought you joy?
- How have you been caused to resolve anything in your life?[1]
Notice that none of these ideas (attitude, motivation, virtue, joy, resolve) can be seen or held in one’s hand. As I have written elsewhere,
“You can’t see an attitude. You can’t touch an emotion. You can’t taste a mindset. But I can certainly experience attitude, emotion, and mindset in a person’s body language, tone of voice, or facial expression. In education we call this kind of learning affective. Learning that reaches to one’s thought process, that works to transform someone’s spirit, is affective learning.”
[1] Notice that none of these ideas (attitude, motivation, virtue, joy, resolve) can be seen or held in one’s hand. As I have written elsewhere, “You can’t see an attitude. You can’t touch an emotion. You can’t taste a mindset. But I can certainly experience attitude, emotion, and mindset in a person’s body language, tone of voice, or facial expression. In education we call this kind of learning affective. Learning that reaches to one’s thought process, that works to transform someone’s spirit, is affective learning.” Mark D. Eckel, “1 Essential Educational Practice: Reflection,” 13 December 2022, https://markeckel.com/2022/12/13/1-essential-educational-practice-reflection/