Hank Aaron, Ozymandias, Memory, and Human Impermanence

WHO WAS HE? [2 minute read]

The great Hank Aaron died last week. There was a time when I would not have to say more than his name. Those two words together would bring a cluster of thoughts to any American’s mind. Baseball. Hammerin’ Hank. Atlanta Braves. Homerun king. All-star. Hall of Fame. Hero. For me, as a young boy, watching a great man play ball on grainy black-and-white television picture, Hank Aaron’s name inspired me. I would go out in my back yard and throw a rubber ball against a stone wall imagining myself catching fly balls in right field like Aaron. Then I would pick up a bat, toss the ball in the air, trying to hit it as far as I could, like Hank. All I had to do was read a sports page or hear that name and I knew immediately WHO HE WAS.

I happened to be in a barber shop when I heard the news. I watched and listened as commentators regaled Aaron and his accomplishments. “It’s a good thing we have ESPN,” I said to myself, “Otherwise folks today might not know who Hank Aaron was, why he was so important to so many.” Yes, other names matter to young sports minds now. We know a great deal about individual athletes in the 21st century. Information about them is available on every screen. But I wonder about those great names of yesteryear, whose personas and accomplishments may be lost without our knowing, without our caring.

“WHO WAS HE?” Is a question that stands outside identity, ethnicity, gender, heritage, or status. Wondering after the history of a person is a reminder to us all, a reminder that people make a difference. “WHO WAS HE?” marks a time, a past, a person who mattered to others before our time. And now that we know something of that person, place, and time, how will it impact us? Will we hear the news of someone’s passing and say, “That’s too bad,” not giving the moment another thought? “WHO WAS HE?” should play a part in our changing, in our maturation, in our respect.

As I awoke this morning thinking these thoughts about Hank Aaron, my mind recalled famous poetry entitled “Ozymandias.” Two 19th century poets, Percy Shelley and Horace Smith, in friendly competition, submitted renditions of the same idea: all die, persons and accomplishments lost to future generations. For those interested, it will take all of thirty seconds to read each of the poems; it will take a lifetime to grasp their importance. The title of the poem is the Greek name of an Egyptian king, Ramses II. The poet looks upon the ruins of colossal statues, covered by the sands of time. The poems should bring to mind our impermanence on earth and eternal questions about life.

“WHO WAS HE?” is a question some may ask about us years from now. No, our exploits will not be recorded in some Hall of Fame. Neither will there be an ESPN to remind others of our legacy. Nothing may remain of us save items for sale on a Goodwill shelf. “WHO WAS HE?” brings to mind a series of questions:

  1. Does what we remember, matter?
  2. Do we care enough about history to study it, care for it, apply it?
  3. Can we be certain of anything in this life, after death?
  4. Do we consider the impermanence of our own lives?
  5. If impermanence exists, is there anything permanent to depend upon?

Musings from 27 January 2021. The questions at the end of my thoughts are meant to prompt folks to think for themselves. My philosophy of life, of teaching, is not to force someone to believe what I do. I believe questions left to themselves are some of the greatest forms of evangelistic-apologetics. No one likes to be “preached at.” But open-ended discussion takes on new meaning when one considers a question.

The Electoral College: Why I Don’t Think It Will Matter After 2020.

About a year ago, during the great concern about how the Electoral College is bad for America, I would hear myself saying, “It won’t matter after this election.”

Don’t get me wrong. I believe there are good reasons why the founders of our nation included the Electoral College in the U.S. Constitution. [If you have questions about this read James Madison in Federalist Papers #10 and a student of the constitutional prescription, Tara Ross, at TaraRoss.com.] The results of a pure democracy can be readily seen in the French Revolution. Mob rule was swayed by the latest popular mood swing because of “the will of the people” (repeated 15 times in the “French Declaration of the Rights of Man”). Democracy is nice if you are on the side of the 51%. But I digress.

In conversations with a historian and a law professor I made my suggestion in the form of today’s title. After hearing my three points, they agreed. I suggest the following ideas purely from a “humanly speaking” point of view (my way of saying, “I am neither a prophet, nor the son of a prophet,” al la Amos 7:14). My forecasting is based on my personal observations and understanding of human nature.

The reasons I do not believe the electoral college will matter after 2020:

  1. Migration. I was reminded of this again when I read of the exodus out of California to Texas. Californians are (generally) known to be more “progressive” in their political persuasions. A large population increase in a more politically “conservative” state like Texas from California could, in years to come, change the electoral college results. Just today (20 Jan 2021) I noticed an article in Linked In that suggested a similar occurrence in Tennessee:

“In a U-Haul study of more than 2 million one-way rental transactions, Tennessee claimed the top spot for the most one-way U-Haul arrivals” (link here).

The same kind of event took place in Vermont. The Manchester Journal reported how the once “Red” state turned “Blue.” [I am not necessarily making “Red” equivalent to “conservative” or “Republican”, but I do note certain similarities between those groups as I do between “Blue,” “progressive” or “Democrat”].

“By 1970, one in four Vermont residents had been born elsewhere, according to Vermont historian Bill Doyle, and many came from more liberal northeastern states, bringing their ideologies with them” (link here).

Progressive voters moving to conservative states may alter the future of the Electoral College map.

  1. Education. Working in the public university, I have a front-row seat to politically progressive university perspectives. One of the reasons we began The Comenius Institute was to help young Christian college students have a distinctive Christian academic voice on campus. I have recorded numerous conversations with both students and faculty that demonstrate the readings, assignments, and worldviews that are promoted or ignored in the academe. Then I went further. I just completed an M.A. degree in the School of Liberal Arts where I serve Comenius students. I have sat under the instruction of departmental professors whose political views are either declared in class or by the assignments given. The future of the educated in this country will mirror the progressive education which has tutored them. The population, by and large, will displace any “conservative” state’s influence.
  2. Population. Older Americans tend to be more “conservative” in their viewpoints. But the older population is waning in influence because of something as simple as “the death rate.” Voters in more conservative states will be “replaced” by the young, whose worldview has been largely influenced by the “progressive” culture of America. The Electoral College map will shift over time by something as simple as the death rate.

Perhaps in the future I will write more about definitions of “conservative” and “progressive.” But on the eve of a new president’s inauguration, I thought it would be important to write this musing. A fourth point that I would make here is best left as the conclusion. Whenever the discussion of a subject falls off the journalistic radar, it is time to take notice. I believe the journalists and those who supply reporters with the content of their articles, stop talking about something when it doesn’t matter anymore. Hence, the title of my musing, “The Electoral College: Why I Don’t Think It Will Matter After 2020.”

How I Communicate on Social Media (FREE)

My approach to social media engagement.

Originally posted on Facebook 15 January 2021. [2 minute read]

Some wonder why I don’t speak out for or against certain events or persons on social media.

On one side, there are those who consider me ‘weak’ for not addressing issues. On the other side, some view my words as too forceful when I use my public voice.

So, let me be clear about how I do or don’t communicate in the digital presence of thousands.

My 10-point approach:

(1) I will *never* apologize for having and communicating a biblical mindset, wherever Scripture takes me.

(2) I make no apology for beginning with doctrine arising from Scriptural admonitions, nor will I sidestep the application to life I find there.

(3) My starting point will always be theological, then, sociological. Others may, and do, reverse that order; that is their prerogative, not mine.

(4) I will speak and have spoken to cultural-political issues across a wide spectrum, beginning with a decidedly biblical-theological position. I do not reverse that order.

(5) I refuse to stoop to respond to the inanities of memes, strawman arguments, article-wars, or the latest fact-checker craze. Period.

(6) I will be glad to and have engaged with individuals and their thoughtful ideas in a venue which suits us both. I will be judiciously honest when we disagree. I will celebrate our agreements while I will clearly mark out our distinctives.

(7) I have been and will continue to be irenic (peaceable) not polemic (combative) in my approach.

(8) My prophetic inclinations are those of the trumpeter on the wall, warning of what is to come. There are good people who will respond in other ways. Their voices too should be heard.

(9) Others are well trained in apologetics, law, logic, and philosophy; they need not my help, but I am glad to hear their voices.

(10) I will care for wisdom (generous prudence), meekness (strength under control), and peace (not to be confused with weakness) amid social media firefights (such are not my calling).

I do believe there will come a day when I and other Christians like me will be silenced, whether taken off social media or taken to a gulag. If you poo-poo such an idea, please, read more history. One of the reasons I will create a video series on “persecution” this year at MarkEckel.com is based on my reading of history.

I do believe the latest censorship moves by Big Tech – which I have spoken out against before – bear the marks of literary giants Bradbury, Orwell, and Huxley. For those who celebrate the “take down” of any person or group, I ask you again, to read history. Robespierre celebrated the guillotine during the French Revolution until it was used on him.

The hate-filled loathing against one president has already shifted to the next. I will never be party to such defamation; rather in the spirit of 1 Peter 2:13-17 I will “honor the emperor.”

For those who think I should speak up, I just have.

Civility is Expected in Commerce & the Reason it is Unexpected in Politics

“Civility” in business is assumed.

“Civility” in politics is ignored. Here is why . . .

Matt owns a store. Every customer who enters his store is treated with care. When someone thanks Matt for his service he responds with the now famous phrase, “It’s my pleasure.”

Anna is a fitness coach. She draws clients by her winsome nature. Her encouragement to every person, no matter how they perform in their workout, is an attraction to return.

Why are Matt and Anna successful business people? One reason is, they treat others with respect. Why is treating others with respect important to Matt and Anna? Because their work is their livelihood. They pay their bills, care for their families, contribute to their communities with the monies earned from their work.

Walter Williams, famed economist from George Mason University, used to say,

“Do you think the farmers in Idaho grow their potatoes because they love the people in New York who eat their potatoes for dinner? No! Idaho farmers operate as everyone does in business, based on gain.”

Everyone wants their business, their livelihood, to succeed. Business people – no matter who they are – have to consider the bottom line. The bottom line depends on commerce with customers.

Respect of others is the basis for transactional commerce in Deuteronomy 24:10-13. The central value of commerce in Moses’ law is based on a concern for others. Deuteronomy states that loans are based on property one already owns. Our culture calls that “collateral.”

But the commercial agreement is based on goods another man has in his house. The text is plain. The one who has loaned the money stands outside the borrower’s house. The man who owes money goes into his house to decide what object of worth he will part with until his loan is paid. The clear teaching is that the one who makes the loan treats the borrower with dignity. The debtor decides what valuable he will part with to allow him time to pay back what is owed.

Further, such an action relieves any psychological stress on the one who owes money. Imagine the banker coming into your house deciding, then demanding, what he would keep until the debt was repaid?! Moses’ law showed compassion for the poor person and demanded respect for that person, from the rich person.

Moses’ instruction does not stop there. What if all the person has to give as collateral is his cloak? The cloak was important in the ancient world. The temperature – even in desert regions – falls dramatically overnight. A poor person would need their cloak to keep warm. During the day, the poor man, the borrower, would not need his cloak, the weather being warm during the day.

But the teaching is straightforward: if you have taken the cloak as collateral, then the cloak should be returned at night so that the man might stay warm while he sleeps. However, and this is important for the borrower, the reverse is suggested by the text: the cloak should be given back during the day to the person who is owed money. Such an act, by itself, was a reminder of the debt that was still owed.

The whole of the commercial transaction rests on the last statement in Deuteronomy 24:13,

“You shall restore to him the pledge as the sun sets, that he may sleep in his cloak and bless you. And it shall be righteousness for you before the Lord your God.”

Treating another person with dignity – treating them civilly – displays a righteousness. Doing what is “right” is not based on some human commitment. Doing “right” is based on a righteous God who gives a righteous law (Deut 4:8). The person who has been changed (declared righteous by God like Abram was in Genesis 15.6) keeps this righteous law, not out of his own effort, but because he has been changed. The results are righteous because the Law is “righteous, only righteous” (Deut 16.20) since God is righteous (Deut 32.4).

So why is civility absent in politics? My view: there is no direct, immediate connection between commerce and customer, between the bottom line and a politician feeding his or her family. Sure, there is compromise when bills are debated before lawmakers. But there is no righteousness standard connected to respecting others in a business arrangement where one person directly depends on the other for their livelihood.

God’s Law exists as a benefit for people (Deuteronomy 30:9-14).

 

Pride and the Need to Discipline One’s Soul

Pride and Discipline of the soul.

Roman military success and political eminence served a providential purpose.

R R Reno writing in First Things discusses Augustinian political theology.

In our day – for any day or anyone – “pride” and “glory” take center stage.

Reno notes, however, from Book V of City of God that Rome excelled “in matters of human honor” and “we may profit from the kindness of the Lord our God by considering what great things those Romans despised, what they endured, and what lusts they subdued.” The Romans disciplined  their souls “for the sake of merely human glory” but their example can be useful to us in subduing pride.”

Why should Christians promote Roman virtue? Augustine says, first, that our teaching could change. 

Reno continues

By Augustine’s accounting, God’s providence ensured Rome’s worldly successes “for the advantage of the citizens of the eternal City [the City of God] during their pilgrimage here.” For as he recounts, the great Roman heroes did not covet wealth, and they often made great sacrifices in order to win praise from their fellow citizens. We do well, therefore, to “diligently and soberly contemplate such examples.” The pagan Romans can put the followers of Christ to shame, and their example can awaken in us a heroic desire for sanctity. If Rome, an earthly city, “was so greatly loved by its citizens for the sake of merely human glory,” how much more should we be willing to serve the heavenly city.

Reno notes that parents should be concerned for “soulcraft.” We parents set an example for our children. We set aside wealth and human attainment for the benefit of our progeny. As Reno says, “Properly ordered earthly loves can prepare our hearts for a higher love.

The second point taken from Augustine is that our views of human politicians could change. The Romans gave up their private good for the public good. The motive was to “bask in the glory of the Roman populace.” Not everyone is motivated by money. Some are motivated by the need of self-congratulation. Christians refer to such attitudes as “vain.” Yet, it was this vanity that secured national freedom and preserved the opportunity to Christian flourishing. Both Augustine and Reno suggest we must not forget that in earthly terms, one may lead to the other.

GLORY meant one thing to the Romans and means something else to us Christians. It should be remembered that what we see in this earthly life may be a dim reflection of what God originally intended for His image-bearers. We can learn much from our unbelieving counterparts. As Jesus said, “The sons of this world are more shrewd when dealing with their own generation than the sons of light” (Luke 16:8).

Found here in the print edition (February 2019 p 67) under the heading “Augustinian Political Authority.” Also online here: https://www.firstthings.com/article/2019/02/a-failing-papacy

Prayers for First Responders, Educators, Those Suffering Illness & Loss (Free)

For politicians, medical personnel, and teachers; and, for all our needs for presence & security. Written prayers during the pandemic since mid-March, 2020 through to the new year, 2021.

 

Green and white cathedral interior

A PRAYER for POLITICAL LEADERS
Dear Lord. Bless all those in authority as we come alongside them in our prayers. We recognize the primary importance of petitioning before You in Heaven for those You have given a charge on earth.

We make this supplication for needs deeply felt during our time of crisis, knowing our dependence is in You. We ask that our leaders be swayed by Your Spirit as He convinces them to act with righteousness. We also make this prayer to You for needs always with us, for administering equitable justice. We ask that our leaders be reminded of their burden for benevolent protection of the whole populace. We further make this urgent pleading on behalf of others before Your throne. We ask that our leaders be receptive to bold appeals for those in their care, knowing they need Your guidance as they guide the citizenry. We moreover make an offering of praise, grateful for Your Providential superintendence over institutions and individuals. We ask that our leaders be driven to a spirit of gratitude to You, for their station, on behalf of the civilians they serve.

May we remember our responsibilities before all those in authority. As the first century believers were to pray for even megalomaniac Roman tyrants, so we, who live in relative peace and security, have no excuse but to thank You for government officials who represent us now. We bear responsibility for intercession with respectful dignity, not antagonistic opposition. We bear responsibility for prayer with virtuous civility, not undignified displeasure. We bear responsibility for prayer that offers inner and outer tranquility, not relentless agitation. We offer these entreaties because it is good to do so, knowing it pleases You for us to pray for those who lead us. In the name of Your Son, we beseech You. Amen. [A prayer based on the intention and interpretation of 1 Timothy 2:1-3.]

A PRAYER for TEACHERS
Dear Lord. When we think about the future on earth we think of our children and grandchildren. But those of us who are teachers consider our pupils to be our “children,” the future of who and what will come after us. We love our students and our subjects both. Our deep commitment to the humanities or sciences, whichever is our bent, our God-given giftedness, is what we desire to pass on to those who follow us. Our view of students will not change, no matter our situation.
Lord You have given us an opportunity to show the rest of the world what we teachers do every day: to shift and move, no matter the climate of the class. We redirect discussions, answer questions that have nothing to do with what we’re teaching, rethink in seconds how to solve a problem, and analyze emotional circumstances that rival the work of psychologists.

And yet, Lord, we can move in those different directions, retaining our original mission because of the mindset You have instilled in us. Help us then, Lord, to maintain the core of our curricular commitments while transitioning to yet another interruption in our day. We are used to disruptions Lord; help us to navigate our present circumstance for the benefit of our students.

May we learn to transfer the fervor we have for our studies in class-time to face-time. May our communication on a screen be no different than it has been in person. May the discipline we have to organize our time in one place transition easily to another place. And may the love You have given us for learning be now transmitted through our teaching to that generation of young people who are our children, the future, the hope of the next generation. We thank You for our present opportunities, amid complexities, in the name of Your Son. Amen.

Doctor injecting person

A PRAYER for MEDICAL PERSONNEL
Dear Lord. Bless those who serve Your image-bearers, servants of bodies You have created. As they serve those bodies, protect theirs Lord. Go before, behind, and surround them with Your angelic host to guard their bodily safety. And for those bodies unseen, undetectable by human eyes, pathogens under microscopes which seek our destruction by their very skewed nature, cordon off alien bodies from doctors and nurses.

Show Yourself strong and prevailing against hosts seeking the destruction of those who serve others. We request our prayer be heard, Lord, not as a matter of course, not in the usual way, but in these days of travail, we require Your immediate and ongoing intervention. In the name of Your Son, we pray. Amen.

 

Persons hand on water

A Prayer for PRESENCE
Dear Lord. Since You have made us in Your image we realize when we don’t see others, we miss seeing You. Lord, we live in the days of Zoom, YouTube, Skype, and Vimeo but it’s just not the same. You made us for PRESENCE, for physical connection; for You made us with 5 senses, touch included. Being distant from each other, even on screens – especially on screens – we know that flickering images are just a tease. We see but can’t hug. We have eye contact but can’t hold hands in prayer. We hear a voice but cannot feel the breath of presence. We miss it Lord. We are thankful for our homes, the many amenities which are ours in this day, in this place; we are not ungrateful people. But we realize we have taken for granted Your Presence, since, when we see others, we see Your image. So as we wait to return to our families, our jobs, our daily lives, may we remember Your presence with us when we cannot see the presence of Your image in others, we know You are still Yahweh Shammah, The Lord, The Covenant God, Who is Ever-Present. Amen.
[See Genesis 28:15; Ezekiel 48:35; Psalm 23:4; 46:1; 139:7-12; Jeremiah 23:23-24; Revelation 21:3]

A Prayer for Security

Dear Lord. Life is upended. “Cancelled” is everywhere. Plans are scrapped. Calendars mean nothing. Comforts have evaporated. Jobs have ceased. Stores are shuttered. News is awful. Abnormal replaced normal.
We struggle with questions: “What’s next?” “Will I get my job back?” “What kind of future will I have?” “What happens if I have to start over?” “Will I go bankrupt?” “Will I have enough money to live?”
Uncertainty has replaced “guaranteed.” We are full of doubt. It is hard for us to make decisions. We hesitate to give answers. Holding our emotional breath, part of us wonders if we will ever breathe again.
Tears form in our eyes for no apparent reason. We sit starring off into space without thought. We are tired when we haven’t worked. When we think of all the things we could do, we watch Netflix instead.
Lord, as we have been ordered to withdraw from others may we draw closer to You. Might we find solace in You, The One who is from everlasting to everlasting. Remind us that You know our beginning and our end. Our reliance in the future is our reliance in You who knows the future. Renew our commitment to “hope,” knowing we cannot live one second without it.
Hear us in our insecurity, Lord. Help us to help. Lift us as we lift others. Renew our spirits as we comfort the spirits of those around. And may we dwell more on Your Name, than our own name. Amen.

Green and white cathedral interior

Prayers for Uncertainty, Loss, Healing

Dear Lord. Bless my brother. Give him emotional strength to overcome the emotional trauma of these days. Give his body quickness to heal. Give the doctors Providential wisdom to circumvent his pain. Give him the sustenance of Your Word, good books, his loving family, and supportive church members. Above all, Lord, give my brother hope. I pray this prayer in Your Name, Yahweh Rapha, the LORD who heals. Amen.

He will deliver you from the deadly pestilence.
His faithfulness is a surrounding shield.
You will not fear
the terror of the night,
nor the arrows that fly by day,
nor the pestilence that stalks in darkness,
nor the destruction that wastes at noonday.
Because you have made the LORD your dwelling place.
– Psalm 91 snippets I pray before The Throne for you today

Hear, now, this prayer: LORD! This is Your servant requesting grace for Your servant! LORD! Our brother needs Your healing *now* Your expedited cleansing *now* Your Beneficent touch *now*. LORD! Hear my urgent prayer. I’m banging on the door! LORD! I’m rattling Heaven’s gates! LORD! I’m lookin in the windows, knocking on the glass! LORD! May it be so!

Dear Lord. It’s your servant here again asking for the health and well-being of my brother. Lord, I do not understand Your Providences. I wonder after Your allowance of pain, loss, calamity, and suffering. Yes, Lord. I have read Job. I have read the gospels. I know church history. In spite of what I know, Lord, I can’t help what I feel. Your simple servant asks again after his brother. Lord, give him reprieve from the tumult of the procedures he must endure. Lord, grant him comfort in the midst of hurt. Lord, give him full command of any vocabulary necessary in lament. Lord, give him Your comfort, Your rest, Your peace. I am a little voice making a big ask for my brother. Lord, hear my prayer. Amen.

Orthodoxy: The Importance of Bible Doctrine (FREE)

Doctrine means belief; a body of accepted, systematic learning or teaching. 

Doctrine comes from the word for doctor meaning an “expert” or “authority”; doctors are scholars who seem to be right in their understanding of a subject and can teach about their expertise.  Orthodoxy means “straight teaching.”  Right belief should result in “straight practice” (orthopraxy) and “straight commitment (orthopathos).

What does Scripture says about doctrine or teaching?

Matthew 7:28, 29

Acts 2:42

Romans 16:17

1 Timothy 6:20-21

2 Timothy 4:2-5

Titus 1:9

Hebrews 13:9, 10

Everyone has doctrine.  Doctrine produces at least three beliefs:

Everyone believes something, that is, everyone has faith in something or someone.

    1. Who do we trust about cars, stocks, medicine?
    2. Why do we trust them with our money, cars, health?
    3. When do we doubt what we have come to trust?

Everyone begins somewhere, that is, everyone begins with their own assumptions about life.

    1. What do we assume to be true about a supernatural world?
    2. How will we know if our assume is correct?
    3. When do we find out if our knowledge is correct?

Everyone questions everything, that is, everyone subscribes to a personal philosophy of life.

    1. What do you believe about private property ownership?
    2. What do you believe about politicians?
    3. What do you believe about the reason for violence?

Why is doctrine important?  Because everyone asks the same questions[1].  Jot down an example for just one of the questions (e.g., “Truth: I have a hard time knowing whose knowledge to trust”).

  1. What’s Real? (the seen and unseen; metaphysics/theology proper)
  2. What’s Truth? (the origin, history, and authority of knowledge; epistemology)
  3. What’s Best? (right and wrong, good and bad; axiology, ethics, aesthetics)
  4. What’s Human? (dignity and depravity, purpose and meaning; anthropology)
  5. What’s Ahead? (afterlife and judgment; eschatology)

Look up Rich Mullins’ song lyrics ‘Creed” online.  Note the following statement in the refrain: “…what I believe, is what makes me what I am, I did not make it, no it is making me, the very truth of God, not the invention of any man.”

Why is this statement “it is making me” so important to understand, not just for Christians, but for everyone?  (for a hint, look at Philippians 3:10 “becoming like him”, see also Romans 8:29).

Notice the close tie between teaching doctrine and singing doctrine (Colossians 3:16).  Why should doctrine be sung?!

[1] What is real?  Who is God?  Who are humans?  What is our purpose in life?  Where does knowledge come from?  What is right and wrong?  What is history?  What happens after death?

Does “Certainty” Exist in an Uncertain World? “Trust” in the Bible

Who do you trust?

Government? Media? Clergy? Business leaders?

The Edelman Trust Barometer says we’re in the middle of an “infodemic,” and people have lost trust in all news sources. Trust in social media is at an all-time low. [linkedin.com/news/story/weve-lost-trust-in-social-media-rpt-4304977/]

Desperate to have his child restored to him with Jesus’ healing, a father, shouts, “Lord, I believe: help my unbelief!”[1] Faith is necessary for belief: a personal, human response to real, supernatural Truth must accompany one’s trust.[2]

But my faith, my commitment to God’s Word is not the same as “possibly” or “I hope my team wins the Super Bowl.” The importance of “trust” in the Bible is an assurance a confidence that something will for sure happen.

The Hebrew word for trust is “amen” which literally means “so be it.” Saying “amen” at the end of a prayer, for instance, is based on trustworthy authority. The New Testament words for “faith” and “belief” are equal to amen.[3]

The word amen captures the fullest meaning of a person’s faith. Saying “Amen” is an informed decision to commit oneself to God.[4]  Another Hebrew word for “trust” seeks safety, a sense of security. In Christian terms, we are placing our confidence in God. Proverbs 3:5 uses this word, “Trust in the Lord.” We “commit our way to the Lord” because “He will act,” so we “trust in the Lord and do good” (Psalm 37:3, 5).[5]

Some people trust in human beings[6], others in violence[7], still others in riches[8], military power[9], or in one’s own goodness[10].  The result of this misplaced trust is complacency[11] and shame[12].

But for the Christian, deliverance[13], answered prayer[14],”straight paths”[15], inner peace[16], and joy[17] result from one who listens to the admonition “trust in the Lord”[18].

We are not surprised that The Edelman Trust shows people have lost trust in social media and human leaders. The certainty we have as Christians is placed in The Eternal God who certainly has our best interests at heart.

 

[1] Mark 9:24. Some had real problems believing, including the disciples (cf. 6:6; 16:14; Matt 13:58; 17:20).

[2] Hebrews 11:1-6 and 11:7-40 respectively.

[3] Notice a summary statement of some OT uses of “faith,” “belief,” or “trust”: Abram exercised belief in God (G 15:6); Gen 45:26—“unbelievable!  Joseph can’t be alive!”; Ex 4:5—the opportunity to believe in truth is there if they want it; Ex 4:1, 8-9, 31; 14:31—people may or may not exercise that belief; Num 14:11—“I can’t believe it!”–God’s response when people do not exercise belief; Num 20:12—levels of trust, commitment; Deut 1:32—mistrust in the face of past promises fulfilled; Deut 9:23—distrust when commanded; 2 Chronicles 20:20—exercising belief based on God’s spoken word; Job 24:22—surety is not based in human power, position, prestige; Psalm 27:13—Confidence based on patience; Psalm 78:22, 32—unbelief in the face of provision and miracle; Psalm 106:12—belief in the face of intervention and miracle

Psalm 119:66—desire for instruction is based on belief in God’s written word; Proverbs 14:15—prudence planning everyday affairs; Isaiah 7:9—human responsibility and effort are necessary in exercising faith

[4] Lawrence Richards, Expository Dictionary of Bible Words, 114.

[5] Batah, John N. Oswalt, Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, 101.

[6] Psalm 118:8; 146:3; Jeremiah 17:5.

[7] Psalm 55:23; 62:10.

[8] Psalm 49:6; 52:7.

[9] Deuteronomy 28:52; Psalm 44:6; Jeremiah 5:17.

[10] Ezekiel 33:13; Hosea 10:13.

[11] Isaiah 32:9-11; Ezekiel 30:9; Amos 6:1.

[12] Psalm 31:14.

[13] Psalm 22:4.

[14] 1 Chronicles 5:20

[15] Proverbs 3:5

[16] Psalm 4:8; Isaiah 26:3.

[17] Psalm 16:9; 33:21.

[18] Proverbs 16:20; Isaiah 30:15; Jeremiah 17:7.