3 Change-of-Heart Student Stories

If we only tell stories about how bad soldiers or priests or businesspeople are without telling the stories of the good that people do, we are not only missing out on positive ideals but we are recasting America in a way that only shows the skewed images in a fun-house mirror.

A student is writing a story in my class about police. Her view is very one-sided, an obvious caricature of the constant noise of “police are racist” or “police are evil” (her phrases). I offered that the kind of piece she is writing will only be read by one group of people. My suggestion was that she might want to have a more balanced view. I asked her if she had ever talked with a police officer, if she had ever gone on a ride-along. My points are shared in the form of questions. I want students to consider all points of view.

One young man was writing a pro-life perspective on abortion. I emphasize in class that students should be considerate of their language, how they might attract others to their viewpoint. He was using the term “leftist” throughout his piece. In a personal conversation I asked him why he used that term. He told me that the word was used in his home. So I asked him if he wanted to have people with whom he disagreed read his paper with an open mind, and would they, if their current perspective was cast with a word that is pejorative or combative. “If,” I began to close my discussion with him, “We cast people in an adversarial role how do you think they will respond?”

Another young person, who is from an immigrant family, wanted to talk about how ‘bad’ our country is. She and I talked the other day. After listening to her story, I asked questions as I usually do. “Why did your mom and dad want to come to this country? If they thought you and your siblings would have a better life here, why would you suggest that the very reason your folks brought you here is now suddenly ‘bad’?” She had not ever thought about these ideas. When I asked her why she wanted to write the paper as a jeremiad against America she said, “That’s all I ever hear.”

We spoke for a bit longer. I hope her perspective becomes a bit more measured. I hope that the ideas I suggest in classes, ancient Hebraic wisdom such as “hear the other side of story before believing the first thing you hear” (without chapter and verse, Proverbs 18.17) finds fertile soil in her mind.

A few examples suffice to say that if you only hear one-thing, you will come to believe that thing as truth. The question I am constantly, constantly telling my students to ask is, “What am I not hearing?” If you want to be fair, generous, empathetic, and kind (all attributes to which students give credence) then the way you portray people, groups, institutions, and countries needs to reflect these character traits.

I love my students and I want them to have a broader view of the world than the one they come from, than the one they hear about all the time on the ‘net, in film, during streamers, or at the university. I believe in nothing more strongly than viewpoint diversity.

AFTERWORD I work very hard in one of the major papers of the semester to help students move away from bias toward attracting people to a point of view. There is too much class instruction and practice for an overview here. Suffice it to say, the students are often half successful (as my three stories point out). But in my comments to them, that is where more traction can be gained. And then, late the semester, they have a chance to revise their writing for a final portfolio. I have always questioned rather than proselytized. There is no compromise of principle; there is a desire to pull up a metaphysical chair next to someone and ask, “Can you explain why you went in that direction?” And then, “Might there be a more nuanced way to explain yourself to your reader?” Education, for me, is relationship. To put a point on it, the young immigrant in the third story I tell here came to me and asked if I could recommend some books for her to read. 

Don’t Believe Anything I Say

I was embarrassed. It was a stupid mistake. And I mean, “stupid.” I posted something in social media that looked “true,” when, indeed, it was false. Not “false,” in the way of trying to mislead, but “false” in the way that I missed the clarification, “Upon further review, this story is false.” I didn’t read all the way to the end. I rushed and did not do, due diligence. True, it is a small thing. Not many read my reportage, save one, a friend, whose “wounds,” in this case, were good and true.

The momentary glitch in my thinking reminded me of what I have told students from Day One, “Don’t believe anything I tell you. Go. Search it out for yourself. Make sure what I’m saying is true.”

I have taught in multiple venues, across various disciplines, in public university, in Christian university, in K-12, in PhD. At some point in my teaching I repeat the mantra, “Don’t believe anything . . .”

“Proselytizing” has never been my way of educating. My standards are high (ask my students), without apology. Why? Because I don’t want students to need me. There will come a day for any class, any student, that I will not be around to answer their questions. I want them then and there to be equipped, not only with the tools of learning (something else I harp on) but with the mindset that they bear responsibility for knowledge accrued and interpretation offered.

The world is full of voices clamoring to be heard. When young minds hear the latest “news,” will they take it as gospel truth or will they research, study, think, and question? When young minds hear the latest “study,” will their first thought be “Really!” or “Really?” When young minds see the latest “photojournalism,” will they seek the context and notice how the picture was cropped? It is not simply the subterfuge of “deep fakes,” as disturbing as that deceptive practice is, but it is concern for the definition of words, the bias of the reporter, the worldview of the paper, or the thin research of online content.

We have always tackled the toughest subjects in my classes since I began to teach in 1983. Humanist Manifestos I & II. Sexuality in music. In-vitro fertilization. Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Andres Serrano art. Filmmakers’ worldviews. Psychologizing of humanity. Immigration reform. Joseph Campbell’s The Power of Myth. Drug addiction. Mental health. The 1619 Project versus 1776 Unites. Abuse in the home. Business ethics. Racism. Sexual identity. If it mattered in the culture, it mattered in my classroom.

And I should be quick to add, my purpose in addressing cultural concerns was not “relevance.” No, I wanted students to see that biblical teaching (in Christian contexts) or perennial principles (in public contexts) were constantly in play. The world may seem a revolving door, constantly spinning, full of “change,” all seemingly “new.” Yet, it is the “old,” ancient wisdom, woven through human nature, embedded in the creation, which we see each day or each century. It is my responsibility as an educator to prepare my students, not for the latest technological marvel, but to steel them against its unethical use and inhuman abuse.

And it is in moments of my own ineptitude that I am reminded of the very ideas that are sacred to me as a professor. It goes without saying, perhaps, that I hold myself up as evidence of why students must research, think, question, and offer their own alternative points of view. I am in search of true Truth.

 

I have been teaching over a 40-year span. “Don’t believe anything I tell you” has been my mantra since day one.

Grades Are Earned

A mother confronted me once about the grade on her son’s writing work in my class. “But he spent so much time and effort on this paper!” The young man was also studying in a vocational education environment. His course of study at the time of the parental conversation was welding.
I listened to the mom. When she finished her passionate defense of her son’s work, I mentioned his welding class. “How would it be,” I began, “If, while testing the weld, a trailer was attached to the truck’s ball joint, the weld broke, and the trailer fell to the ground?”
As the mother contemplated the scenario I asked another question, “Would the welding instructor think your son’s weld merited an ‘A’ because he had spent so much time and effort on the project?”
The mom’s annoyance came through her voice as she defended the potential welding effort, “But all my son’s friends said he did a good job!”
I asked one last question. “Would you yourself pay for a weld that held or one that fell apart?” Once finances came into the picture, the discussion was over.
I recount this story in response to student comments which come my way from time to time. Students may quibble about a grade they “received,” assuming the teacher is “giving” something. When the standards are clear, rubrics are ascribed ahead of time, and student work is judiciously assessed, grades are earned, not given.
Mark has been teaching over 40 years, Jr. High through PhD. This is one of many memories that will be included in my educational memoir. Find many articles on education on this site and warpandwoof.org

A Turning Point in My Life

Why do I teach?

For moments like this.

Find out what that moment was with our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, SnappyGoat

FULL TEXT

Students from the past write to me from time to time, rehearsing a fond event they remember most. Here is one example of a student memory that should cause a smile, and perhaps create a lesson. In the student’s own words:

One of my favorite memories from your high school sophomore class begins with you assigning us to interpret the worldview of a song of our choosing. As a joke (because I took nothing seriously and fancied myself so incredibly funny), I picked Disney’s “When You Wish Upon a Star,” thinking I’d gamed the system by choosing something apolitical and comically benign. When I received your grading of my interpretation, I was surprised to see that you took me seriously. You’d told me I’d made a good choice and wrote some critiques about how I could have said a little more here and there about the song’s message.

It was then that a light bulb went on. I realized you believed “When You Wish Upon a Star” communicated a serious message. I realized your belief was correct. I realized something I’d thought communicated nothing, had in fact, preached a very meaningful message. I realized there was no such thing as benign media; everything is preaching something. It was a serious turning point in my life. To this day, I can’t say the words, “authorial intent” without thinking of you.

I am so pleased for the testimony of this student. He is one of many. But it is not the personal acclaim that is so exciting. What makes me so pleased is that the student discovered my mission as a teacher: do your own thinking and own your belief. Yes, the *light bulb* came on for him, a clear indication of ownership. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth – especially from students – wherever it’s found.

 

 

 

 

 

Infuriating

It happened again this week. “Prof, what should I write about?” I smiled and asked, “What are your interests?” He thought for a moment and said, “Cars.” I asked, “What do you like about cars?” He thought for another moment and said, “How fast they go.” I asked, “Can you give me examples of your fast cars?” He thought for a third time, “I love F1 race cars.” I asked, “Is there a story you can tell me about your F1 race cars?” He didn’t ponder his answer this time. Instead, he blurted out, “Why do you keep asking me questions when I ask you a question?” I smiled again and asked, “Why are you interested in my answers when you are doing such a good job answering them?”
For forty years I have been infuriating students with my responses to their serious queries. But if they become a bit testy with my responses they soon learn my objective is always the same: getting students to think on their own, then own their thinking. It’s real easy to spout off, to lecture, to preach. It’s real hard to think with someone, to wrestle with ideas, to ponder over the great questions of life. I “profess” as a “professor” when it’s necessary. But I would much rather walk the road of thoughtfulness with students, suggesting alternate routes or the advantage of stopping to view an intellectual landscape.
And if you asked me after reading my thoughts here, “Don’t you believe something so important that you want to tell your students about it?” I would ask, “How is the best way to answer the great questions of life?” And you might respond, “But isn’t that your job, to teach, to tell, to pronounce?” And I would ask, “How do I do my job as a teacher if I don’t make people think?” And you might respond, “But isn’t it easier to tell than ask?” And I would smile and ask, “What is best for the student?”
And you might ask one last question, “Where did you learn to answer questions with questions?” And I would ask, “Have you ever heard of Jesus?”
I have been teaching for 40 years, from junior-senior high to undergraduate through masters and PhD studies. My teaching always includes questions, in anticipation of student thoughtfulness, helping students to think for themselves.

12 Days of Teaching

Having finalized grades, and in keeping with The Holiday, I made up my own carol, to be sung with gusto to the tune of “The 12 Days of Christmas.” Dedicated to all teachers everywhere.

On the first day of teaching my students sent to me

“I need an ‘A’ in this class”

On the second day of teaching my students sent to me,

Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the third day of teaching my students sent to me,

Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the fourth day of teaching my students sent to me,

Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the fifth day of teaching my students sent to me,

FIVE HUGE BEGS, Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the sixth day of teaching my students sent to me,

Six papers posing, FIVE HUGE BEGS, Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the seventh day of teaching my students sent to me,

Seven notions lacking, Six papers posing, FIVE HUGE BEGS, Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the eighth day of teaching my students sent to me,

Eight needs repeating, Seven notions lacking, Six papers posing, FIVE HUGE BEGS, Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the ninth day of teaching my students sent to me,

Nine quizzes failing, Eight needs repeating, Seven notions lacking, Six papers posing, FIVE HUGE BEGS, Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the tenth day of teaching my students sent to me,

Ten projects missing, Nine quizzes failing, Eight needs repeating, Seven notions lacking, Six papers posing, FIVE HUGE BEGS, Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the eleventh day of teaching my students sent to me,

Eleven excuses giving, Ten projects missing, Nine quizzes failing, Eight needs repeating, Seven notions lacking, Six papers posing, FIVE HUGE BEGS, Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class

On the twelfth day of teaching my students sent to me,

Twelve grounds for-passing, Eleven excuses giving, Ten projects missing, Nine quizzes failing, Eight needs repeating, Seven notions lacking, Six papers posing, FIVE HUGE BEGS, Four absences, Three missed preps, Two poor plans and I need an ‘A’ in this class.

1 Essential Educational Practice: Reflection

Rethink. Reconsider. Ponder.

True education begins when one takes personal responsibility for it.

Find out why by reflecting on our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

 

Picture Credit: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

“You make my brain hurt!” I wish I had a dollar bill for every time a student has said this about my teaching. The point is not that my classes are hard, it is the hard thinking I make my students do. Often, I will give students questions to reflect on. “Reflection” is not a small matter. Taken seriously, reflection is very difficult to do because it requires a person to dig deep in their own thinking, to actively pursue a process of evaluating their own thought processes.

You can’t see an attitude. You can’t touch an emotion. You can’t taste a mindset. But I can certainly experience attitude, emotion, and mindset in a person’s body language, tone of voice, or facial expression. In education we call this kind of learning “affective.” Learning that reaches to one’s thought process, that works to transform someone’s spirit, is “affective learning.” You can’t see someone’s spirit, but you can see someone’s spirit. Confused? Maybe a quote will help. Denzel Washington is famous for saying,

“It is easy to spot a red car when you’re always thinking of a red car. It is easy to spot opportunity when you’re always thinking of opportunity. It is easy to spot reasons to be mad when you’re always thinking of being mad. You become what you constantly think about.”

Simply, if you’re only reading one way, if you only think one way, you will not consider other ways. I’m not suggesting you give up your baseline beliefs. I am suggesting your beliefs need to be carefully considered. Yes, I still make my student’s brains hurt. But it their reflection on ideas, answering questions for themselves, that will save them from a lifetime of real hurt.

For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, President of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found.

3 Lessons from Aristotle

Clear thinking and communication

necessitates three important stages.

Find out what they are by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

 

Picture Credit: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

When I teach the college course “Argumentative Writing” I have students read Aristotle. The ancient philosopher outlines three key ingredients toward any discussion. “Pathos,” in the ancient sense, was about the emotion stirred in an audience by the speaker based on the argument made. “Ethos” is about the credibility or authority of the speaker. “Logos” maintains that arguments should be based on logic, an ordered approach to debate. If we jettison any of these components, or highlight one over the others, we cripple our discourse.

One of the reasons I love teaching on the public campus is the opportunity to be with others who may think differently than I do. I grow in my understanding of people who have varying points of view. Neither of us is necessarily giving up our beliefs; but because we are face-to-face, civility returns. We hear each other. Friendships are born. Camaraderie is built; even between people who disagree with each other’s point of view. Persuasion is based not on volume but on the value of an argument.

As a researcher and writer, I care deeply for factual transparency and honesty in reportage. I read across a wide spectrum of viewpoints. To obtain various points of view I read from The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Atlantic, National Public Radio, and The Wall Street Journal. But I have not found anyone who reports facts with such transparency and honesty as Bari Weiss. I spend money on subscriptions because I care to be widely read in culture, politics, ethics, economics, and religion. Bari Weiss is not conservative or progressive, Democrat or Republican. She is, in the truest sense, in the classic sense, a reporter. And I believe Aristotle would appreciate how Bari maintains pathos, ethos, and logos in her argumentative writing. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, President of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found.

 

5 Steps to Take for Bias-less Education

If education involves curiosity

all inquiry is necessary.

Find out why answering ONE QUESTION makes all the difference (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

 

Picture Credit: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

In last week’s Truth in Two I suggested that I could summarize the two major takeaways from PhD study that apply to everyday life. Last week I identified the first major PhD lesson as this: As soon as you’ve asked a question, you’ve biased your research. What you care about will impact how you study about that thing. Every PhD researcher and frankly every person alive has to learn not to let your care of a subject bias or slant your viewpoints. The second major takeaway from PhD study that applies to everyone, in all of life, comes in the form of a question. When seeking information, ask, “What am I *not* hearing?” If all the news you ever hear, for instance, comes from one political point of view, you must ask, who disagrees and why?

In a recent class a student wanted to write about climate change. She observed, however, that she could not find any research from anyone who disagreed with the popular views on climate change. She asked me why. I walked to the white board and wrote two words:

“misinformation” and “disinformation.”

I began my explanation this way. “If those who control information do not allow other evidence to be presented with these two labels, your job is to ask, “What am I *not* hearing?”

When seeking information, pursue these five steps.

(1) Begin by asking questions.

(2) Compare and contrast the answers.

(3) See if there is room for common ground.

(4) Offer alternative solutions.

(5) Moderate your voice with words like “might,” “may,” or “perhaps.”

PhD study is rigorous. But the two major takeaways for me are simple. Remember what you care about will bias your thinking and always ask, “What am I *not* hearing? For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, President of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found.

5 Questions to Ask for Bias-less Communication

Biased communication results from

Five unasked questions.

Watch our Truth in Two to find out why (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

 

Picture Credit: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

In 2009 I earned my PhD degree. Earning a doctoral degree is a very long, very difficult process – as it should be. But to be honest, I can summarize the two major takeaways from PhD study that can apply to everyday life. In this week’s Truth in Two, the first major PhD lesson is this:

As soon as you’ve asked a question, you’ve biased your research.

What you care about will bias how you study about what you care about. That you care is not the problem. The problem is that you might neglect other arguments or perspectives simply because they do not match your own. Your care for a subject should include viewpoints different from your own. Every romantic relationship, for instance, deals with bias all the time. We have a tendency to only hear what we want to hear from our partner. And those of you with a significant other already know how that’s going to turn out!

During one of my classes I list my biases, how my views of life are slanted, how my thoughts are impacted by things like ethnicity, nationality, or religion. In part I say, “I am a Euro-American man who is a Christian.” I have a European heritage, I come from the nation of the United States, my gender is male, and my religious views are that of a Christ-follower. My biases, your biases, are not the problem. *Not* admitting our biases? That’s a problem.

Here are five questions to ask that could begin to eliminate the problem of biased communication

(1) Could I be wrong?

(2) Have I looked at all sides?

(3) Am I broadminded?

(4) Do my biases mislead?

(5) Are my sources correct?

Admitting we are biased is the first step toward building good communication and community. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, President of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found.