Knowing When Not to Fight

Douglass MacArthur taught us a valuable lesson:

we don’t have to fight every battle.

Be reminded of our debt to veterans in this Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

During World War II Douglas MacArthur mapped a strategy called “island hopping” to win the war in the Pacific theatre. To achieve the ultimate objective of defeating Japan, MacArthur decided to only attack islands that would benefit the ultimate objective of victory. But the real advantage of skipping an attack on some islands was that they were heavily fortified. Instead of attacking Japanese strongholds MacArthur bypassed them, saving lives on both sides. Sometimes the best strategy for dealing with those ready to fight might be not to fight at all.

A person might be wise by the battles he doesn’t fight. Maybe you have been in situations like I have where the person with whom I have a disagreement is very good with words. The wisest way for me to respond to that individual is not with more words. Piling my words on top of their words will just continue the fight. Perhaps the better way to counter the conflict would be to do something nice. Proverbs 25 says that kindness heaps “burning coals” on my adversary, meaning, he is ashamed that his attacks have been countered with unexpected goodness.

Or maybe you have been in a situation, like me, where a foolish person has done something that has hurt you. Proverbs 29 says that a wise person knows it is pointless to argue with a fool. The fool’s only response to my words is rage and ridicule. Proverbs 23 says I should not even speak wisdom within earshot of a fool, who will only despise the “good sense” of my words.

As we anticipate Veterans Day, honoring American soldiers for their service to our country, it might be wise to remember MacArthur’s principle: sometimes the best strategy is finding a way to win without fighting every battle. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth, but not needing to always say it.

 

Science and Misinformation

Galileo teaches us

what scientific research really is.

Find out more by watching our Truth in Two (with full text and Afterword).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

Galileo stood against the accepted viewpoint of his day. The Church had decided that Earth was the center of our solar system. Galileo proved that the view was untrue; in fact, our planet revolves around the sun. The Church of Galileo’s day tried to suppress his views. Galileo, like other great individuals, stood against the crowd and refused to believe the accepted scientific narrative of the day.

I had a student last year writing on climate change. The design of the paper mandated that students find at least two sources disagreeing with their own perspective. The point of the assignment is to learn how to respond to the best sources and arguments from an opposing position. My student was seeking scientific research that went against the accepted narrative. Knowing I am a theologian, she said, “I don’t want any religious people’s research.” My response was simple, “Everyone’s research is religious because everyone’s research depends on assumptions.” She said, “But I can’t find any scientists who disagree with my view. Why is that?” I went to the white board and wrote “Misinformation.” I explained, “There are those who want to dismiss alternative viewpoints. They do this on social media platforms by simply eliminating research that disagrees with their own.” Looking perplexed my brilliant STEM student responded, “Then how will I find the two sources I need?” I smiled and said, “I’ll show you. I’ve been keeping a record of some scientists whose research has been classified as “misinformation.” And they have published their work in scientific, peer-reviewed research journals.” You can find some of these scientists at the end of this Truth in Two. You see, when “misinformation” is used to sideline alternative scientific sources, science becomes nothing more than propaganda.

Galileo stood against the accepted viewpoint of his day. There are scientists today, doing the same. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking Truth, even when it’s hard to be found.

AFTERWORD

There are some who think study of the liberal arts – including “religious studies” – are “academic dead ends.” Well, I have news for you (as I did for my student). Everybody believes something, assumes something, and they apply that belief to whatever they study. The decline of “religion” is everywhere (if that means people who are leaving orthodox Christianity). On that score read 1 John 2.19.

To dismiss a point of view simply by calling it a lie or “misinformation” is not “science.” You cannot claim to believe in science and misinformation at the same time. Experiment, evidence, thesis, and debate are essential for data retrieval and analysis. Canceling or taking down a scientifically tenable position – whether others agree it is tenable or not – cannot claim what science does. Until a theory or idea is evidentially proven false, it still must be considered as having standing in the scholarly process. Questioning is important.

‘Caught-Red-Handed’: Scientists Call for Full Retraction of Nature’s Proximal Origin Paper, as Fraud Accusations Mount | AIER

1600 scientists dismiss climate emergency, saying carbon dioxide is important for the planet.

Pseudoscience is what a Nobel Prize winner in physics calls the “climate agenda.” Since his remarks at an international conference in July, invitations to speak have been postponed or cancelled. According to Dr. John Clauser there is no “man-made global warming.” His concern is also economic since places like the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are expecting Western nations to spend trillions of dollars to overcome the problem when the monies could be used to help poor and suffering peoples.

You mean scientists “whitewash” data and hence their conclusions delivered to the public? Yes.

 

 

 

Personal Peace & Affluence

What will you stand for?

What are you willing to lose?

Answer the questions by watching our Truth in Two (full text and Afterword follow).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

“I don’t want to get involved.” “I don’t want to speak up.” “It’s none of my business.” “There’s nothing that I can do.” Maybe you have heard some of these phrases from others; maybe you have uttered them yourself. When we see a problem, what is our response? Our general struggle may be that we like to be liked; we don’t want to disagree with anyone. Or we may hate to rock the boat. Or we may be timid in the face of disagreement. Or, honestly, we may simply look at a problem and say, “I don’t know what to do.”

Or maybe, when intimidating forces face us, we may simply want to keep quiet and keep what we own, out of selfishness. Francis Schaeffer warned people about a self-centered perspective when faced with hostility. Schaeffer was concerned with what he called “personal peace and affluence.” Our general disposition is “I don’t want to lose my status, my job, or my friends so I’ll just keep my mouth shut when I see a social problem or encounter governmental overreach of power.”

But there are people like “Moms for Liberty” who have taken a stand for their children and for their children’s education. The seeds of Moms for Liberty were sown during the 2020 Virginian gubernatorial campaign. Parents were being told that educators know best about a child’s education. Parents were frozen out. So, moms banded together for educational reform; these children were their children, after all. Personal peace and affluence were the last things on their minds.

The adage is true, “If you don’t stand for something you’ll fall for anything.” All of us have been given gifts to exercise in our time and place. With those gifts, we desire to benefit all around us, being responsible for preserving what, and who, has been given to us. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking and speaking up for Truth, wherever it’s found.

AFTERWORD There have been numerous essays written about Moms for Liberty. Below is just a smattering of articles written in defense of the group. Here is the press page where you can find more articles about the group Moms for Liberty.

And if it hasn’t been made clear yet, I stand with them.

On a personal note, the one immutable truth I learned in K-12 education is, don’t tick off mothers.

The Free Press, “Who’s Afraid of Moms for Liberty?”

‘I WILL … ERADICATE YOU’: Moms for Liberty Threatened, Treated as ‘Subhuman,’ After SPLC Attack

Nextdoor Cites SPLC to Exclude Moms for Liberty, Alienating Neighbors (dailysignal.com)

Postman’s Warning | MarkEckel.com

Dr. Seuss said it best in The Lorax, “Unless someone like you / Cares a whole awful lot / Nothing is going to get better / No it’s not.

How will you know when it is time to make your voice heard? Moms for Liberty decided the answer to that question for them was for the sake of their children.

Now and Then

We want everything now.

What’s wrong with that?!

Why? Watch our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

We want everything now. The word “now” is sacred in a culture obsessed with the present. Phrases such as “the latest” or “breaking news” or sounds such as the “ping” of a cell phone dictate immediate desires. In short, we want what we want, now. Gone is the concept of “slow and steady wins the race.” Employers ask instead, “What have you done for me lately?”

Our addiction to “now” includes our addiction to our cell phones. A new word has been added to our dictionary slang. The word is “phubbing” – a combination of “phone” and “snubbing” – where we literally ignore the person sitting across the table from us. We are so attached to whatever is happening “now,” that the people with us, are not present, in our present.

Personally, I am much more interested in “then” over “now.” Here are a few practical examples of what I mean. (1) I believe curriculum development is the best long-term investment I can make. Curriculum taught by teachers, for students I will never meet, is a long-range investment. (2) I believe in friendships made over years in the lives of fellow faculty and students whose futures will advance others. (3) I believe in teaching Truth which is adaptable to any culture or context for all people, for all time. (4) I believe in the hashtag #nextgen because the work I do “now” will influence others “then.”

Jesus focused on the long game. His teaching forecast the future which taught how to live in the present. He dedicated Himself to disciples who would take His message to the world. Jesus said The Holy Spirit would live in His Church until His return. And Jesus taught more about Heaven and Hell than anyone else in the Bible. His focus? You better prepare “now” for “then.” For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking Truth wherever it’s found.

 

Ageless

A perennialist like me tends to swerve from the oncoming flow of traffic, insistent upon the import of ‘now,’ and focuses instead on lessons taught over and over through history. Developing the muscles of character by adhering to a workout informed by the past strengthens a person to meet ‘now’ with ‘was.’

What can we learn from great thinkers of the past?

Who influenced them?

Where did their thoughtful insights originate?

When were the ideas appropriated?

How did these ideas benefit these minds for the public good?

Why do we not focus on the perpetual Truths in ways that can fashion our current culture?

I am after those perpetual ideas since they are ever with us throughout the ages; so, Ageless, in their application. Can we not see the longevity of loyalty versus popular fads? What is it about trust that we push it aside for human idols? Why can we not hold on to nobility, instead, opting for the spirit of revenge? How is it that the friendship deepened over years is thrown over for the next new face, a potential prop for our projects? Where is sacrificial love despite the constant lure of ‘I need to get mine before they do’? Ideas of lasting Permanence are the stuff of legend, heroic exploits, lived by great people in terrible times, held up for example, not because they are new but because they are, of Old.

Permanent things necessitate temporal things are not so important. Dr. Mark Eckel is president of The Comenius Institute. He has been teaching and writing over 40 years.

 

4 Tests for Extremism (with Terry McIntosh)

What do all dictators have in common?

Watch our Truth in Two and find out (2 min vid + text).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Kathy McIntosh, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

My friend, Terry McIntosh is a very well-read historian. When he and I talk, there is always a stack of a dozen different history books next to him that he is reading all at once. One of our consistent discussion points is the problem of authoritarianism in its various forms. One day he explained what happens to extremist groups which seem to be on opposite sides of a controversy. “Take any glass.” Terry began, “Place your index fingers on either side of the glass, showing opposite positions.” I was intrigued, Terry continued, “It doesn’t matter if we are talking about fascism or communism, far-right or far-left politics. Your group may be on the opposite side of the glass, but as your group becomes more extreme, whether to the right or left, eventually your fingers meet at the same place.” Terry concluded with a simple statement, “As all perspectives become more extreme, they lead to the same place, authoritarianism.”

You see, authoritarian leaders want control. Influencing media, manipulating government agencies, or establishing laws designed to limit opposing views are ways authoritarian leaders’ rule. There is an easy four-step test to see if some leader wants control.

(1) The leader is always telling you how bad another group is.

(2) The so-called “bad” group is always marked by negative terms like “far-right,” “conspiracy theorists,” or “controversial.”

(3) The “bad” person or group is always telling “lies” or promoting “misinformation.”

(4) Finally, the authoritarian leader tells you more restrictions are needed to stop the opposing viewpoint.

All authoritarian, totalitarian leaders end up in the same place: limiting information, restricting freedoms, jailing enemies, and covering their own wrongdoing. From a Hebraic-Christian perspective, it is sin that produces extremes, and everyone, every group, is susceptible, no matter what side of the glass you’re on. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found.

Perennialists and Preservatists

Why I think perennialism

is the best way to live life.

Watch our Truth in Two to find out why (2 min vid + text).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Angel.com

FULL TEXT

Perennials are flowers that grow back every year. Once planted, the flowers can continue to bloom from one spring to another. The word “perennial” signifies what the flower does, coming back each year. In history the word perennial means “evergreen, continual, or lasting.” I have taken the definition upon myself to identify who I am as a Hebraic-Christian thinker. I am a perennialist, a person who believes in universal truths which are true throughout time, applicable across cultures.

As a Christian perennialist, I believe that universal truth originates from The Originator of the universe, who is Jesus, according to Colossians 1.15-20. If Jesus is the origin of all truth, then His Truth exists for all time in all places. Truth properly applied can benefit all people everywhere. As a perennialist, I do believe that Heaven’s Truth can and should be applied; concepts such as justice, freedom, conservation, care for others, and creation of wealth are for the betterment of all.

Let me be clear: I am *not* suggesting that humans always employ Heaven’s Truth correctly on earth. Words like “justice” or “freedom” can be abused by everyone since we are all inherently corrupt; this is the reason why Jesus had to die for the sin of the world. Now, some of my friends would call me a “conservative.” In the sense that I want to conserve the great ideas and ideals handed down to me, they are right. I would, however, rather call myself a “preservatist,” someone who preserves the great ideas and ideals for future generations. Indeed, The Comenius Institute itself, captures the great, universal ideas of John Amos Comenius applying them forward, into the 21st century. Just like the flower, I believe in the everlasting, perennial nature of Truth as it adds beauty to the world. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking perennial truth, wherever it’s found.

 

Liberty & Justice for All?

If we believe in “social justice,”

we should answer two questions first.

Find out why by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Wikipedia

FULL TEXT

“Social justice” is a phrase that individuals and institutions throw around without definition. But students in my classes can’t get away with such a lazy approach. If a student writes a paper using the phrase “social justice” I will always, somewhere in my comments ask two questions,

“What is your ‘social’?” and “What is your standard for ‘justice’?”

Here is an example. A student wrote a declarative comment in his paper saying,

“If there is no justice, there will be no peace.”

He meant that if there was no justice for his social group, his group would not allow anyone to live in peace. It’s a nice sentiment and certainly sincere. But do you see the problem? He did not define any of his terms. So, I asked him,

“If your social group can demand ‘justice’ can the group that opposes your group demand justice too?”

He wasn’t sure how to answer so I continued,

“Upon what basis will you demand justice? Where does that justice come from? What standard gives you the authority to say something is unjust?”

It was obvious the student had not considered the questions. So, I began at the end of his concern saying,

“You think everyone wants ‘peace’ from what you said, is that right?”

He shook his head up and down. “Good!” I continued, “So do I!” He smiled. “So,” I said, “Let’s see if we can find how we get to ‘peace’ by exploring the answer to those questions,

“What is your ‘social’?” and “What is your standard for ‘justice’?”

I went back to the teaching we had done in class on the need for ethical standards to come from somewhere outside ourselves. When the paper was revised, the young man had done diligent work to express why his social group was important and that justice must be based on a standard of right, originating from outside ourselves. It is a lesson for us all: be careful to define our terms.

For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally committed to the idea that our desire for justice, springs from the righteous standards, set by God.

HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY!

Backing into Knowledge

Instead of digging a deep hole

it might be easier just to fall in.

What do I mean? Find out by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, Snappy Goat

FULL TEXT

Often, I find myself backing-in to big ideas or big idea people. Here’s an example. I loved the Jesse Stone movies when they first came out and began to ask, “I wonder where those stories originated?” That bit of a quest led me to Robert B. Parker, author of over 50 novels. I dug a little deeper and discovered that Parker earned a PhD in literature. Still further I found that Parker’s PhD dissertation was based on pot-boiler crime writers like Raymond Chandler. The Big Sleep, a Chandler creation, became one of the great film-noir movies of all-time, starring Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall. “That’s so cool!” I thought, “A PhD student chased down the authors of pot-boiler crime novels, and then went on to write them himself!”

I could go further down that rabbit hole, but I’ll stop there. Do you see my point? I backed-in to knowledge. I backed-in to someone’s PhD work. I didn’t begin where most academics begin, focused on a problem, then digging a deep hole of research to find an answer. No, Mark, not paying attention, falls in the deep hole and wonders how he got there. But since I’m in the deep hole of unknowing I begin to think, “Oh! That’s interesting!” And I start to explore.

That’s what I mean by “backing-in.” Sure, I’ve earned a bunch of degrees doing research necessary for that field. But honestly, the work I do often begins with the thought, “Oh! That’s cool!” rather than “There is a problem. I’m going to find a solution.”

Maybe you’re like me. You watch some movie and think, “I wonder where that came from?” And you’re off. You pursue your interests. Your interests become your passions. Your passions cause you to enjoy life’s delights. And at the end of the day, you realize you just backed-in to knowledge.

For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of the Comenius Institute, personally seeking truth wherever it’s found.

Pride Before the Fall

What can Dr. Seuss teach us?

A lot, as it turns out.

Why? How? Discover the answer by watching our Truth in Two (full text below).

Support MarkEckel.com (here). Find the MarkEckel.com YouTube Channel (here). Mark is President of The Comenius Institute (website). Dr. Eckel spends time with Christian young people in public university (1 minute video), teaching at Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, and interprets culture from a Christian vantage point (1 minute video). Consider becoming a Comenius patron (here).

Pictures: Josh Collingwood, SnappyGoat, Wikipedia

FULL TEXT

“Would you rather have me give a 45-minute speech on pride, or read Yertle the Turtle in five minutes?” I ask my students after reading the story. It’s no surprise. After I read Yertle the Turtle to my college students, they request Dr. Seuss, not a lecture, every time. I read the story from a large, hard-cover book, holding it high, so all can see the illustrations, just as I would, if I were reading to my grandchildren.

The story of Yertle teaches us that position, power, and pride can usurp freedom, rights, and care for others. Yertle is a turtle king. He is not satisfied with where he is in the pond. He says,

“With this stone for a throne, I look down on my pond / But I cannot look down on the places beyond.”

So, Yertle commands the turtles to create a stack so he can climb on their backs, in his words,

“If I could sit high, how much greater I’d be!”

He is higher, until, a plain turtle named Mack questions the whole enterprise. In case you’ve never read the story I will leave out any spoilers.

But beyond the obvious message, is the way the story is told. Seuss created memorable characters in King Yertle and Mack. The illustrations are pure Seuss – wonky and wonderful. But I believe it is the poetry that best captures attention. Rhyming is signature Seuss. But rhyming can close the loop on understanding, as primary teachers know full well.

There is a reason I have been reading this same story over and over again for years. The teaching is timeless. But most important to me is the universal concept that words have power, and the power of words can dethrone a king’s arrogance. For Truth in Two, this is Dr. Mark Eckel, president of The Comenius Institute, personally seeking the power of words, to tell the truth.